|
||||||||||||||||||||
Article
New York, NY User-centered research & design firm dedicated to helping companies connect their business objectives to the needs and expectations of their customers » See all resourcesshared by Catalyst Group . Want to share your content on GreenBook.org? Site Design Should Reward Frequent UsersCatalyst Group This report takes a look at interface design challenges and opportunities of catering websites for new and repeat users. Read this article for practical, experience-driven advice and tactics for building websites that survive and succeed. A crucial survival skill in the maturing Internet environment will be the ability to design sites and services that identify and respond on an ongoing basis to customer needs in real-time. This responsiveness must be as evident to the loyal, frequent user as it is to the first-time visitor. However, as a user’s experience and familiarity with a site’s design increases, their needs and expectations evolve. Paradoxically, many websites don’t reward – or even accommodate – the increasing user interface sophistication of their most frequent users. These sites risk frustrating their most valuable customers and, potentially, losing them to the competition. Most companies recognize that rewarding their best customers with special offers or incentives is an effective way to maintain, and even enhance, loyalty. This principle applies equally well to website design. In order to win the loyalty of the next generation of Internet users, sites must recognize that, at any given time, their current user base will consist of a mixture of new visitors and frequent, loyal users. Sites certainly need to be designed to deliver great experiences to new users, but as a site’s audience grows there will also be valuable opportunities to “reward” the best customers by offering design features and functions that are specifically catered to their advanced needs. Up to now, most sites were free to ignore this problem and focus their site design almost exclusively on new users. In fact, companies like AOL, Yahoo and Amazon succeeded in the early stages of the Internet’s growth largely because they optimized their site design for visitors who were not only new to the site but also new to the Internet in general. At the time, these users represented the vast majority of the Internet audience. With so many more experienced Internet users in the current population (see table), it’s no longer enough to design a simple site that is easy to understand and use the first time.
Today’s Internet users will be easily frustrated by a user interface that doesn’t provide advanced options for the frequent user. Therefore, sites must take great care to design interfaces that appropriately balance two design imperatives:
This dilemma can also be phrased in terms of the tension between conversion and retention. A site interface designed for new users will tend to focus primarily on conversion – the transformation of a casual visitor into a frequent user or customer of the site. However, an interface that is aimed at retaining frequent users - i.e. encouraging them to return to the site more regularly and/or spend more time on the site during each visit - will offer design features that allow practiced users to accomplish their goals more quickly or derive enhanced value from “power user” functions that would baffle a less experienced user. There are several well-established user interface design tools and devices (“Expert Features”) that can help make a site’s design more efficient for frequent users. Expert Features tend to follow some basic guidelines:
Many of these tools are in use on various sites today. Here are some examples: 1. Accelerators Amazon: 1-Click Ordering
Monster.com: Search Agent
2. Shortcuts Schwab: Login
CDNow: Persistent Menu
3. “Don’t Show Me This Again” EXP: Reminder
BigStep: Hide Help Text
4. Progressively Reveal Advanced Features Electric Library: Simple & Advanced
Oxford English Dictionary: Default or All options on
Selecting any of the five preference options (i.e. pronunciation, spelling, etymology, quotations, or date chart) will alter the display to reveal more information. These option settings are persistent and will continue to be used for further word searches unless changed. Users can therefore select the most appropriate display for their specific use without being overwhelmed with details initially.
5. Clear, Informative Feedback WhitePages: Search & No results message
Design Action Plan 1. Get to Know the Frequent User Note: Some sites have business models that assume infrequent use – e.g. sites that sell mortgages or provide tools and information for weddings or vacations. If a site is used so infrequently that its visitors will never become frequent users, then it is obviously most important that virtually all of the site’s core functions be designed primarily to meet the needs of new users. Moreover, special features particularly aimed at site novices (such as tours, demos or “wizards” that simplify important processes) may be called for in these cases. 2. Employ User Scenarios to Identify Design Opportunities User scenarios that simulate the usage patterns of a site’s most frequent (and loyal) users can be used to flush out potential interaction problems or inefficiencies that may grow out of repetitive interaction with the site. When exploring these scenarios, companies should take a frequent user’s perspective and ask:
Not surprisingly, it is often the very features that were specifically designed to make the site “easier to use” (i.e. more accessible and understandable to new users) that may eventually frustrate and irritate frequent users. Most importantly, companies should identify these potential trouble spots and offer alternatives without affecting the usability of the site’s core functions. 3. Create and Test Design Prototypes -2001 This content was provided by Catalyst Group. Visit their website at www.catalystnyc.com. [Mar 22, 2010]
Other Resources By Catalyst GroupWait, I can do what? (A study of Amazon and Netflix on-demand video services) | Case Study Catalyst Group
eReader Showdown – Kindle 2 vs. Sony eReader | Case Study Catalyst Group
Google vs. Bing – Search Engine Preference | Case Study Catalyst Group
Eye Tracking Study: Friends List Layouts | Case Study Catalyst Group
Putting the "trust" back in Bank & Trust | White Paper Catalyst Group
Online Dating: Usability Study Report | Case Study Catalyst Group
Extra Credit: An Eye Tracking study of Credit Card Websites | Case Study Catalyst Group
Beyond Red and Blue: Insights into the Design of Presidential Candidate Websites | Case Study Catalyst Group
Screen Size Matters: Best Practices for Designing Websites to Match Browser Resolution | White Paper Catalyst Group
Net Rage: A Study of Blogs and Usability | White Paper John Franklin, Catalyst Group
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||